the brilliantly leaping gazelle

Category: Uncategorized

In a parallel world, is Renton from ‘Trainspotting’ a bit like Adam Johnson…?

Before I go any further I would just like to make it clear that what follows is not meant to be an excuse for, and neither should it be interpreted as, a justification for  Adam Johnson. No doubt you’ll be aware of who this individual is. But in case you’re not here is a short summary of why he’s in the news. He was earlier this week convicted of grooming and kissing a 15-year-old girl and engaging in sexual activity with her. The judge warned him that he faces a lengthy custodial sentence. To anyone right minded any individual who has sexual relations with a minor is worthy of vilification, ostracism, and lots of other –isms.

But…

Despite not wishing to seem to be providing a spurious means of explaining away Johnson’s crime, they perfectly illustrate the dichotomy inherent in society’s attitude towards the sexualisation of children. I cannot help but compare his treatment and vilification in both the courts, the press and the court of public opinion, unfavourably with the treatment handed out to Bill Wyman. You remember Bill Wyman don’t you? Him from the Rolling Stones who admitted having started an affair with Mandy Smith when she was 14 years old – she claims that the relationship was sexual – before a short lived marriage when she was 18. The police subsequently decided not to bring any charges against Wyman despite the fact that like Johnson he knew that the girl in question was clearly under age, but unlike Johnson his alleged sexual activity with the young Mandy might reasonably cause a cacophony of alarm bells. One might imagine for example, the arbiter of all that is moral in this country, the Daily Mail to fulminate and denounce him as a wicked individual and a corrupter of innocence, but there was not. Certainly the police wouldn’t act that way now, not with child sex abuse investigations rightly held to more scrutiny than before.

This double standard is reflected in all sections of the mass media and in popular culture. It is hardly fair to single out the Daily Mail for opprobrium when the majority media are just as culpable. The sexualisation of young teenage girls – from Primark selling push up bras for girls young as seven, to a fifth of 12 year olds reluctant to go out without make up on, from catwalk models as young as 14, to beauty pageants for very young girls and most disturbing of all, sex shops selling ‘naughty’ school uniform costumes – an alarmingly worrying backward trend has taken place culturally. We are entering a new era, rather like the Victorian one, where sex was puritanical in public, yet perverse in private. Similarly despite repeated calls for something to be done, nothing is. The hypocrisy is widerife. Somehow I don’t think this was what he had in mind when the then Prime Minister John Major called for a return to ‘Victorian values.’

The hypocrisy inherent in such posturing was evidenced by the reaction to the ‘Brass Eye’ paedophille special. Now as anyone familiar with my blogs will no doubt be aware, I hold Chris Morris in the very highest of regards. It is my opinion that the ‘Brass Eye’ paedophile special was bang on target. (Although given that the media’s sometimes voyeuristic portrayal of paedophilia, and its focus on the more titillating aspects of it was the target, it was an easy one to hit. It wasn’t – and didn’t seek to – to make light of the serious nature of paedophilia.) But this didn’t stop the then Labour Child Protection Minister Beverly Hughes from condemning the programme with indignation, without having endured the tiresome necessity of actually being bothered enough to watch it. In so doing, she articulated the very problem that Morris was so effectively lampooning; that not only are certain subject matters ill-served by framing them in a simplistic televisual narrative, but also that some people who pontificate from the high moral ground sometimes fail to realise that the ground on which they are standing is but sand.

This was further exemplified by an edition of the Daily Star a few days later, when on the page proceeding a condemnatory article about the ‘Brass Eye’ special there was a photo of the singer Charlotte Church – who was then aged 15 – captioned “She’s A Big Girl Now!”

It’s not that I’m excusing Johnson but in a parallel world isn’t he a bit like Renton from the film ‘Trainspotting’? Renton sees Diane at a club, she takes him home, they do the beast with two backs, only for him to discover the next morning she’s in fact a schoolgirl.

 

(If you’re a female and reading this then I would urge you to think back to your teenage years when in order to gain entry to a nightclub or to get served in a pub you would judiciously apply your make up to look older than you were.) Quite often this ends in nothing more than innocent fun, but it is easier I would contend for a young girl to look older than she is, than for a young man to look older than he is.

One more thing, the age of consent varies widely in Europe. In some countries it’s 14, in others its 18. I would say that having an age of consent of 14 years of age is hard to swallow but given what I’ve written above I don’t think its all that appropriate.

So the problem is society’s. That’s not to in any way to suggest that adults shouldn’t take responsibility for their own actions but in a culture where young girls are objectified, where young people have to be reminded that domestic violence and rape is both morally abnormal and antithetical to civilised society then really; should we be all that surprised when someone does an Adam Johnson?

 

Really?

 

(If you’re getting this as an email, sadly you won’t get the embedded you tube links of ‘Trainspotting’ and a news report of beauty pageants. Possibly the web links as well. Those can be found on my blog page.)

When a man you’ve never met before invites you on to a couch, asks you to take your top off, then proceeds to stand behind you whilst warming up some lubricant in his hands are you:

a) In a bathhouse in San Francisco in the mid 1970’s? or are you,

2   b) In a banned ‘Impulse’ advert?

or,

3 c) Are you getting physiotherapy?

 

It was to my utmost disappointment that it was c) and not a) because this experience of physiotherapy was rather like anal sex; enjoyable to begin with but all too soon it becomes a pain in the rse. I had gone to see a muscular skeletal physiotherapist in the hope that it might provide me with some much needed relief from my trapped nerve. It gave me no reduction whatsoever when he observed that I’d one of the worst cases of trapped nerve root pain he’d ever seen. Because a few minutes earlier he’d asked me to rate my pain on a scale of one to ten. This brought to mind the moment in the day to day when discussing a wholly fictitious event Spartacus Mills was asked by the incomparable Chris Morris if he could sum up a constitutional crisis in a word. When Spartacus replies in the negative Morris asked him if he could sum it up in a sound?

 

 

As I’ve noted in my blog last week trying to describe the pain one feels to another person makes about as much sense as trying to explain the properties of water to a chimpanzee! I said that given that I’ve got an remarkably high pain threshold, (I once continued playing tennis with a fractured wrist.),  our understanding of what a six out of ten on his wholly fallacious rating scheme was unlikely to correspond with mine. Nor did I tell him that he was causing my irritation threshold to plummet rapidly

Neither did I judge it my best interests to share with him my screaming insight that physiotherapists are nothing more than sadists with qualifications. This was occasioned by the physiotherapist prodding my upper left shoulder back with all gingerness of someone searching for landmines by hand. So when in reply to a “Does it hurt when I press here?” I replied quite immediately and volubly that it did one might have thought he would have avoided repeating the movement that had caused me so much pain.

But no!

 

Instead, he repeatedly and with some choice words of “I know this must really hurt!”, he continued inflicting pain upon me and I thought that only a sadist would not only inflict pain upon someone but tell them whilst they were doing it that it must really hurt! This continued in a variety of interesting positions until the session was near an end. I thought my ordeal was over. How wrong I was! Did I want to be taped up or have acupuncture?

Given that I consider acupuncture to be nothing more than a highly effective way of divorcing the gullible from their money I replied in the negative. However, given my speech impediment he just heard “No”. The nuances of my acerbic wit being lost on him. Mind you he was Australian so…

I plumped for the taping option although I wasn’t quite sure what it entailed. That naivety was as short-lived as a chocolate éclair at a health farm.           All too soon I understood that taping involved my left arm and my left shoulder blade being taped up in a way that prevented the muscles on my left side exacerbating or contributing to any movement that might be ill advised. In other words I looked as if I was awaiting collection by DHL! Or had been involved in some vanilla S&M. Suffice to say I felt like pants!

A bit of a heavy handed segue I know. But we’ve all been there; the sudden realisation that in a couple of hours you’ll be undressing in front of a complete stranger and that you’ll need some clean underwear on. You look in your underwear drawer and you see only various shades of off-white staring back at you. In my drawer there is a pair of thermal long johns which not only are new they also are as white as snow on a country field, whereas my pants are as white as snow by the roadsides! One thinks of excuses to explain your rather cavalier attitude to underwear hygiene but you console yourself that at least your pants don’t have any skid marks. Then you realise that if that the best you can muster as a defence is “At least they don’t have skid marks!” then one has indeed sunk to a new low!

Nonetheless, despite all of the above I’m seeing him again next Tuesday for more of the same, being from the school of ‘If it doesn’t hurt, it isn’t doing you any good’ Think about it. When did you last have a cough medicine you would drink for pleasure?

Aside, that is from NyQuil…

 

 

 

 

 

 

My objective reality is objectionable…

Yes I know what objective reality is – and more importantly what it isn’t – and that I should really have titled this blog post “My subjective reality is objectionable” but I’m sure you’ll agree that “My objective reality is objectionable” is a much better title.

It neatly sums up how I feel about things at this precise moment in time.

Because as I dictate this I’m bedevilled by a trapped nerve. More specifically, a trapped nerve at the base of my neck which has manifested itself in a constant pain in my left upper arm. Quite how anyone is meant to describe pain to another person is akin to describing the properties of water to a chimpanzee – a ridiculous undertaking. What exactly is a sharp pain? Or a dull pain? Indeed, does pain have a chart that denotes its liveliness? Can pain be effervescent or good humoured? Or does it just skulk in the background? Rather like a neighbour you invite to your party and are dismayed when he turns up because all he does is sits in the corner, talking to no one and wearing clothing that a Goth would call unnecessarily colourful. All I know is that my pain is annoyingly constant and even more annoyingly seemingly imperious to over the counter drugs.

Why you might ask, if the pain is so bad is he relying on over the counter drugs? Because of the nature of my brain injury there are certain types of pain killers that I can’t take. Whilst these reasons might be quite reasonable, at 3am in the morning when one hasn’t slept due to the pain and nor is likely to, these reasons seem anything but reasonable.

In order to rule anything out that might be a cause for concern, a few days ago I presented myself to my doctor and he suggested a urine test. Now, I can understand that a urine test can be quite tricky for people especially if they do not come with suitable attachments to get the fluid from one storage area to another. Thankfully, my doctor was on hand to supply some very helpful advice. He reminded me of the doctor in Blue Jam. He described in what he thought was straight forward – but it wasn’t – exactly how the transfer of fluids was to occur. He rather cryptically said – and I quote – “On no account should you let your Percy make contact with the pot” This relied on me knowing what he meant by ‘Percy’. Thankfully, I’ve seen my fair share of ‘Carry On’ films so I’m well versed in euphemisms for the pink oboe!

Specimen pots for containing such fluids have always baffled me. Exactly how is one supposed to gage exactly when to introduce the pot to the stream of liquid amber without getting the rest of the liquid amber all over your hands? One is therefore quite literally taking the proverbial.  In my case this was not the case as rather hilariously I have profound fine motor skill difficulties, which resulted in me dropping the specimen pot into the toilet. If there’s one thing less life affirming I’d be keen to know what it is. Because at that moment when your hands are sopping wet and you’re staring down at a floating rebuke all dignity is gone. What a fun start to the day that turned out to be!

Mind you, in the pantheon of fun days I’ve had since waking up from the coma it was just par of the course. The obstacle course that is my existence now. The way I see it – and the way I see it is through a pair of swimming goggles with one lens cut out leaving the other one to form a moisture chamber around my eye with Bells Palsy – is that it is one thing after another. Once the pain in my arm goes there will soon be another obstacle in its way to confound and annoy me. What it is remains unknown – for now at any rate – but it will come. Then it too will fade and another will foist itself upon me, with all the persistence of a dog trying to shag your leg. I know I wasn’t always this depressed. I know that before the accident I must have felt cheerful, content, relaxed or just calm but if I did I can’t remember them. Or more accurately I can’t remember what it those feelings feel like. I hope you can’t imagine what that feels like. Because I know. And I’ve got that, like an unwelcome guest in my head all, of the time. For over three years.

So when I’m enjoined that the pain in my arm will pass with the admission that yes it’s a bit of an annoyance but it will soon pass, in my state of constant depression I think yes but something equally bad will follow in its wake. Rather than the sunny upland of poetry there is instead the foul quagmire of my reality! Of course this is how I’m feeling today at this exact moment as I dictate this (dictating because if I put any pressure at all on any of my fingers then I immediately get a pain in my left arm).

It’s now the morning after I dictated the above, meaning that I am typing this and it effing hurts. The doctor prescribed me something for the pain, which was as much use as marshmallow axe. Actually a marshmallow axe would taste better. I’m stuck in the eternal present of pain – there is no past and no future, only the now and this constant pain.

And I woke up from my coma for this?

 

Here’s my guide to shopping for Christmas presents…

Buying presents for Christmas 2016, that is.

If you are looking for present ideas for Christmas 2015 I’d suggest that you are leaving it far too late and most importantly, you haven’t been paying attention to what people say.

My reasons are as follows and based on evidence based observations, painful yet instructive, of how not to do things and yet most of you are guilty of some of these. Thankfully I have my parents to thank for me being so good at buying presents. Not because they were so good at it – because they weren’t. As a child, the lowlight of one Christmas was getting a pair of socks, and in answer to my understandably crestfallen demeanour there then followed a long explanation of everything they did for me throughout the year. That was their present to me; the usual functions of a parent somehow transformed into a never-ending feat of selflessness on their part for which I was meant to be grateful.

My brother and I out of necessity developed a coping mechanism for this, as we both knew instinctively that our parents were worryingly unencumbered by parental responsibilities and to make matters worse, upon return to primary school, there’d be an outbreak of competitive bragging about who got what and what they got could do. So, what I’d do – and decades later discovered he did as well – was listen carefully when someone described in painstaking detail to a crowd of hungry ears what a particular toy did and when it was my turn, repeat some of the details. At a frighteningly young age I discovered that fiction could be woven into fact if I wanted it to be.

So chastened by my childhood experiences, I understandably prided myself on never making anyone I ever gave a present to feel as aggrieved as I had as a child. It’s quite easy, this giving thoughtfully appropriate presents thing, although some people – most – conspire by their inactions to make it is difficult as possible.

The most pitiful of all excuses for this  is the line “Christmas crept up on me this year”, (or variations of) as if Christmas can happen at any time of the year, with a weekly global lottery draw to decide if Christmas will take place that week. Then, if Christmas is indeed to be that week, it’s as if the global audience – well just the wealthy citizens of it – act as if a kind of air borne compulsion to spend without reason has been released. As opposed it to being on the same day, every year, since before they were born and after they will die. Or that advertisers blitz the media from mid-November with novel and emotive ways to separate consumers from their money. ‘Look, they’re buying this and they’re happy, you can be too.’ Or ‘Look at these people, hosting a party full of attractive people enjoying themselves because of the table laden with food. Are your friends that attractive?”

It is therefore no surprise to learn that it’s estimated that this year the total UK spend on Christmas presents will be £24.4 billion. Equally, it is no surprise that UK advertisers are spending £310 million on adverts to promote the idea that you can buy your way to happiness. This leads me onto my second point, that given a substantial part of the expenditure goes on presents it therefore makes sense to spread the cost of the presents throughout the year. This isn’t being mean, just practical.

If you listen carefully to what people say they often give you unconscious clues as to what they really would like as a present. It also has the happy benefit of allowing you to spread the cost throughout the year, and also to display a degree of thoughtful consideration which is sadly lacking if you leave it to the last minute.

A good example of this occurred earlier this year, when I said to my Trilby that I’d never watched the Eurovision Song Contest – not all the way through, only bits – and she made me watch the whole sorry spectacle. At one point, she mentioned that she liked Abba – let’s face it, who doesn’t? – and then some time later she mentioned she was partial to a bit of Richard Clayderman. I ignored this comment, but as soon as she was out of the room, I got out my computer and looked on Amazon to see if he had done an album of Abba covers. He had, and six moths later when I gave it to her as one of her birthday presents, she was amazed. My theory being that ultimately you don’t buy presents for the recipient, you buy them for you, as a way of reminding yourself of what sort of person you are. This allows you to avoid taking part in Christmas present bingo.

Christmas present bingo is whereby the recipient unwraps a present, stares at it blankly and then gives fulsome thanks but is careful not to tear the cellophane wrapping. Because they know that they are going to wrap it up themselves and give it to someone next year, most probably to an annoying friend of their partner, a relation that they especially loathe or a hated in-law. I suspect that countless presents suffer this fate.

So, my advice is buy throughout the year – the January sales gives you the chance to get things at a fraction of the price you’ll pay in December – and listen and more importantly act on what you hear. Online shopping means you have no excuse.

As if to prove my theory, the one that posits that you give presents ultimately for yourself, to remind you of who you are, here is my present to you – one of the funniest things I’ve ever heard, courtesy of ‘the twisted brain-wrong of a one-off man-mental’ that is Chris Morris.

 

 

 

 

My council doesn’t provide counsel but instead takes the fun out of my funding review…..

Last week saw my yearly visit from a social worker to assess my current level of funding. It was a non-start carnival of fun! Because if there is one thing guaranteed to highlight how dependent one is on other people, it is arguing for continued maintenance of the current level of funding. One emphasizes the physical limitations one has, what one cannot do for oneself and the risk of serious harm if one were to do so. It’s like the opposite of the song ‘You’ve got to eliminate the negative / and accentuate the positive.”

Initially the social worker had phoned me some weeks earlier requesting an interview the very next day. I managed to postpone him, managing in the meantime to gather supporting statements arguing for my continued level of funding from various professionals. Only a cynic of the very highest order would suggest that by requesting a short notice interview it would prevent the gathering of such information and strengthen the hand of social services to cut funding. However, I’m not a cynic. If I was I might also believe that his assertion that social services had no record of my timetable of hours was nothing more than a trap, given that the council had to sign off on the transfer of funding to me in the first place

The social worker that came to see me was, it must be said, charming and courteous, even if he did throw his coat on the floor and had a rather ill advised hairstyle for a man who’d reached his 40th birthday some years ago. He’d slicked it back into a ponytail that revealed a pronounced widows peak at the front with less of a ponytail than a rats tail at the back. If anything, he was the warm reassuring presence that is designed to lull one into a false sense of security, rather like the nice man whose dog has just had puppies and his flat is only a short walk away. Would the child like to see them?

He was all affable concern and keen to know exactly how me being able to direct the spending of my budget had benefited me. Free from council control I’ve been able to switch care provider, from a local council appointed one (and the fact that the agency my council had chosen charged the council the lowest rate per hour was just a happy accident.). I was also able to engage the services of a wide range of professionals whose efficacy – or not – has been due more to my lack of motivation than their sterling efforts. He was at great pains to identify exactly how many hours I needed and managed to suggest that this was all for my own good, in case of a catastrophic failure in care provision necessitated that the local council provide my domestic care. Dealing with domestic matters was not as difficult as dealing with rehabilitative matters, as a council has a legal duty of care to ensure provision of domestic care, but rehabilitative care…not so much. So it was in my interest to present them both as inextricably linked. So I most certainly did not when he asked about speech and language therapy articulate properly, which required him blankly to look at my friend and she translated it for him. I then explained that he’d provided a good example of why speech and language therapy was needed. If he, in a quiet room couldn’t understand me, then what chance would I have competing with a listener battling background noise?

Thankfully I’ve made no secret of my battle with depression from the outset. As I’ve noted here before, the depression is as a result of my injury or more likely a combination of my injury and my inability to accept what has happened to me. Be that as it may, my psychologist wrote the following in support of my continued funding. She wrote;

One of the key aims of our sessions has been to reverse the downward spiral in which low mood leads to loss of motivation and confidence which results in disengagement from social activities which leads to poorer quality of life and thus to deterioration in mood which feeds into hopelessness, self-neglect, poorer health generally and increased dependence on others.

We have now reached a stage of less frequent sessions in order to allow X time to start putting some of the identified changes into practice. These sessions will end soon and it is his support worker who will be crucial in enabling him to continue to make progress and thus improve his mental and physical wellbeing, and hopefully avoid the need for re-referral to mental health services. This is because the activities that provide social contact and intellectual stimulation and thus help maintain mood and motivation would be extremely difficult for X to access without support due to balance problems (and therefore risk of falling) and speech impairment (and therefore difficulty communicating his needs). Without a support worker there is the risk that X would be largely confined to the house, and the downward spiral described above would continue.

This was echoed by my consultant who first treated me at the rehabilitation unit and has now transferred to a hospital near me where I am under his care. He wrote;

I don’t anticipate that there will be any dramatic improvements in his level of independence, but I am convinced that his current level of therapy involvement is maintaining him safely in the community. If this were to be any way reduced, I fear that he would become much more dependant, and the long term consequences both for X and for his funding agencies would be very severe.

Together with their supporting statements there were also supporting statements from a plethora of professionals and care workers. These not only had the benefit of being something he could take away and read at his leisure, they also helped enforce the notion in his mind that I was a highly organised person. This is important when one considers the motivation of social services. Namely a) are they going to cut funding to someone who appears highly organised and they think might make life highly difficult for them or are they b) going to choose someone else to cut? In this effort I was aided to a great extent by my housemate Old Blue Eyes, who not only made it clear that she was aware of all aspects of my care but more importantly let slip that she was a freelance journalist – which if he Googled her would bring up links to all her articles and programmes (although as she will read this I must be fair and point out she didn’t actually say that), but if he’s got more brains than hair, that’s what he’d do – and that I’d previously written a blog for a national newspaper.

Of course I resisted the rather obvious temptation of asking him exactly how many funding reviews the council had carried out and how many of these had resulted in a recommendation that the funding be increased. Because a funding review suggests an increase is as likely as a decrease. If not it is a cost cutting exercise dressed up as a funding review. It takes the fun out of a funding review!

Is Halloween nothing more than an expensive trick on consumers…?

Here’s a simple question.

Is rounders simply baseball for grownups?

Albeit with massive salaries, lucrative television and advertising revenues (estimated to be $1.5 billion in 2015!), a frankly obsessive love of statistics, (So nerdy, in fact, that Nate Silver, used his baseball statistic analysis algorithm as the basis for one that not correctly predicted the outcome in the 2008 U.S. presidential election, where he correctly identified the winners in 49 of the 50 states but also but also repeated this analytical prophesy in the 2012 election as well.) Nor do I have a problem with them calling a baseball competition where the only competitors are teams from the same nation ‘The World Series’.

No, the problem I have with baseball is that is classified as a sport. It is sport only if we consider French cricket to be a sport.

I ask this not to be controversialist but out of a simple curiosity born out of the fact that despite of the many obvious – obvious to me at any rate –almost identical similarities between the two, no-one else has asked, much less answered this glaringly simple question. Perhaps the conspiracy theorists, who see conspiracies seemingly everywhere, could harness their keen, forensic minds to exposing the truth! As for many years rounders was a game played by primary school children. It was designed specifically so that anyone, regardless of their sporting prowess – and those with none, the ones who looked like small barrels with arms and – could play it. The rules were very simple. If you imagine a clock face as the rounders pitch and the batsman stands at six o’clock and was thrown a ball to hit – usually a tennis ball – by someone standing in our imaginary clock face where the hands rotate from. The batters aim was to strike the ball such a distance that it would allow him to complete a full circuit of the pitch. However if she or he was unable to manage this, there were conveniently placed stops at what would be three, mid-day and nine o’clock. Thus one could complete a full circuit in one go or else one could do it in stages. If one did it in one go, one got a point. If one completed the circuit in stages one was free to bat again. You could be out if you hit a ball and if a fielder caught it or if as you were running towards – or returning, you could go either way -the next stop a fielder got the ball there first. That basically is the rules of rounders and if anyone reading this could enlighten me as to how baseball is different then this in any substantive way, I’d be glad to know.

Apart from an over arm throw of frankly vicious speed by the thrower – what is the difference between the two? Oh yes, there is one major difference between the two! One is a children’s game and one could have been created by advertisers. With so many naturally occurring breaks and it being watched by so many, it makes sense to advertise there. In fact, can anyone think of an American sport that couldn’t have been designed to meet the needs of advertisers?

Pondering this extraordinary similarity between rounders and baseball – of how something has been exported to America and then sold back to us, replete with commercial opportunities puts me in mind of Halloween, which has somehow overshadowed Guy Fawkes Night and in so doing, has become a lucrative retail opportunity, worth over £450 millions. It is now the U.K.’s second most lucrative retail celebration, behind New Years Eve. One wonders why retailers haven’t as yet fabricated another way for consumers to saddle themselves with increasing debt – I mean join together to celebrate the rich diversity of a shared experience – by coming up with a celebration in June and another in September. Spread ‘em throughout the year, that’d give the economy, if no one else, a cause for celebration!

When I was younger than I am now, Halloween was a kind of third-rate affair, only half-heartedly entered into. Bonfire night was the reason one got genuinely excited. I can remember buying hand held rockets – sadly unthinkable now – and launching them via a metal tube with a hole dilled in it for the fuse to protrude. It is so quaint, and rather endearing, to celebrate a failed terrorist bomb attempt. It is a quintessentially English celebration, and other than fireworks and …er..a fire, what else is there to buy? With Bonfire Night, not so much! Public safety concerns have resulted in large displays organized by councils. I despise organized council run displays because anyone pretty much all of the exciting fun – for me at any rate – is safely extinguished by luminous jacket wearing killjoys aided by a frankly ridiculously remote cordon one had to stand behind.

I went to one once. Never again. The sound of the fireworks, which is what I wanted to hear, was competing with some awful ‘music’ blaring out of speakers. Which were attached to numerous temporary lampposts, each surrounded by a wooden fence and a luminous jacket wearing funster.

One of my best ever firework experience’s was in America of all places. People were drawn by some weird firework osmosis to a sports ground in the middle of nowhere. And then using flat bed trucks as launch pads, merrily set off fireworks, proving that if you let people get on with what they are going to do, by and large they behave themselves with a sensible regard for their own safety. Unlike the bonfire party I had the misfortune to only ever hear about, at which some friends put all of the fireworks into one large metal container. You can guess what happened next. One of the first fireworks landed in the box with predictably magnificent results. There are few things worse than frugal firework detonation, much better to let them all off as quickly as possible. If people are mean with the fireworks then you feel tricked, which brings me neatly to trick or treat.

Or as it should be properly known ‘mugging for beginners’ albeit in inasmuch as the victim knows what fate is about to befall them and rather than take evasive action they actively collude in it. Some years ago when my other housemates were out, one Halloween I could hear groups of excited children coming up the path and ringing my doorbell. “Trick or treat!” they said when I opened the door. “Trick’” I said, as I watched the smiles disappear from their faces. “You mean you don’t have any tricks to play on me?” They exchanged bewildered looks with each other and looked for some explanation from their parents who were acting as chaperones, as otherwise trick or treat becomes a home delivery services for paedophiles. I remember numerous groups of parents berating me for not entering into the spirit of things, to which I answered “It was them who came to my door and offered me a choice, I just happened to choose the choice that didn’t suit them”.

Tomorrow night being Halloween we will of course be visited by sweet demanding botherers, but fortunately for them I won’t be anywhere near the door. Someone less misanthropic than me will have that treat!

On a related note, I must tell you about the best firework display in London, The Lord Mayor’s Show Firework Display which takes place this year on the Saturday 14th of November at 5:15pm, between Waterloo and Southwark bridges on the Thames. Whilst the crowds amass in great numbers on either bank of the Thames, the best vantage point is to be found in one of the terrace cafes over looking the Thames at the National Theatre. Until my accident, I never missed it, it was – and is – that good!

One of the many problems with my brain damage is that it didn’t damage my brain enough….

I hate feeling like this, but I can’t help it. It isn’t so much that I want more brain damage, but rather that if I was going to have any at all, that some of it could have affected my cognitive function. At least more than it has. Bear with me here.

In an earlier post I wrote that,

One of the many thorny issues I’ve wrestled with over the years has been the question of whether it is better to be stupid than clever.

In essence I suggested that intelligence was more of a curse than anything, precisely because it gives ones imagination a greater range of options. Rich in detail, bleak in outlook and worryingly addictive, they present one with a plausibly realistic set of scenarios, realistic precisely because one is intelligent and therefore see’s them as such. You may, of course, disagree, and that’s fine. But it’s the way I see it and therefore it’s true for me.

This thinking was at the forefront of my mind during my recent sojourn to Dorset. To call it a holiday would be a misnomer, because as Crowded House had it ‘everywhere you go / you always take the weather with you’, which both literally and figuratively wasn’t great. Whoever said that travel broadens the mind clearly never had depression. Because, if it is true that money does indeed buy you a better class of misery, then it is equally true that depression shrouds any beautiful vista with a gloomy outlook. For that reason, it wasn’t so much a holiday as a helliday, because there was no respite from my thoughts, and therefore it gave my mind ample and ingenious ways to torment me.

And knowing that is in itself another torment.

Being aware that there was a strong likelihood of me not be a happy choppy and not wishing to rely on my memory, I took the precaution of keeping a diary of sorts on my computer – some lowlights of which I’ll refer to – to act as an accurate guide to my mood as it was. (Oh and by the way, anything in italics was written by me today)

fri morn spent contemplating continued utility of being – doing a c b a
(Cost benefit analysis) on my existence –things are only going to get worse, socially, economically and practically – the way things are headed – (If one looks with a rational and dispassionate air at the ways in which society has changed and become even more harsh, especially now under the guise of austerity the weakest are paying the price of others folly, can one really think that future is going to get anything other than progressively worse?) – I ponder this looking out on an idyllic vista surrounded by bees doing their noisy alchemy on the lavender bush – (It’s true. As I was writing these words, right in front of me was the most breathtaking view, which if anything only highlighted the trivial nature of my concerns in the grand scheme of things, formed as it was over many hundreds of million years, a view that will remain as unchanged as it was before I was and as it will do after I am) – I reflect that that bee’s only have an instinct do whereas man is cursed with a knowledge of a past and an sense of what the future might bring – even if it almost always never ever turns out that way – as I dwell on this I hear carefree laughter, which only serves to highlight my foreboding – sense of rootlessness, of not having a purpose.

But in most extreme case of being careful what you wish for, it’s now 06.50am on Saturday 26th September and I’ve been awake since 04.45am, scared to go back to sleep. What occasioned this was me waking up and then feeling a cramp like sensation in my lower left leg, from the calf down. Waiting for it to abate almost immediately, it hasn’t. There is still some tingling, not pins and needles exactly but noticeably there. Pointing my toes up towards my body is something I can do but feel instinctively – why and how I know not – that I shouldn’t. Mindful of the fact that others are sleeping in the house, I’ve gingerly attempted to put some weight on it. It doesn’t feel as strong as the right one, but then I am in a state of heightened anxiety, a state, which has to be said, is in no way helped by occasional twinges in my upper left arm. At least I think they’re twinges.

As I say, I scared to go back to sleep and not just because my Mother had a stroke last year. Am I having a minor one or am I thinking too much? Is my left arm tired just because it is tired or is it something else entirely? Is the slackness on the lower left side of my mouth something real or imagined? And more importantly, why am I writing this, when my time might be put to better use?

This is me, getting shirty…

My shirt shrunk.

Not in and of itself a big deal I grant you, but as metaphor that neatly contrasts how things were with how they are now, it works. I wish it didn’t, but wishing it weren’t so won’t change it any.

The shirt in question was a cotton seersucker shirt, and as such it didn’t doesn’t require
ironing.

Which is just as well.

When I was old enough to realise that no matter how clean your clothes were, if they were nothing more creases arranged into shapes that rembled clothes, then you looked like a tramp with low self-esteem issues, I’ve always ironed my own shirts. In this endeavor my Mum was a great help – I was child after all and knew nothing of gender stereotyping. Despite being clothes conscious herself, this fastidiousness didn’t apply to anyone else clothes. So, more out of necessity than choice I learnt to iron. Not that my Mum didn’t iron anything, but more that there was in her an inbuilt boredom with anything domestic. Which meant that the closer one’s clothes were to the top of the ironing pile, the more care she took. Which meant therefore that the lower down the pile they were, the less attention they got. Bizarrely, no-one else in my family seemed to think this was odd and, much more importantly , that something needed to be done to rectify the situation.

So I learnt to iron. Not jeans – that’s just wrong! One things jeans should never have is a crease – it screams out ‘Way too much time on my hands.’ And underpants – as if as you’re going to be undressing to do the dance with two backs and your partner suddenly runs out of the room shrieking ‘You depraved monster, you don’t iron your pants!’ Nor did I iron the lazy man way, whereby one only irons the parts of the shirt that are on view – so on a hot day, when you see a man still with his jacket on, odds are he’s done some lazy man ironing.

And I never saw ironing as a chore – it was a way, literally of ironing out the creases, of neatening things, of restoring some order in the world. So much so that some time ago, a housemate whom I didn’t much like was preparing for a job interview the next day. Seeing her door open, I asked how she was doing, more out of politeness than of any genuine interest. A conversation then ensued, during which I commented about the shirt she had hanging on a hanger. Was she about to iron it, I enquired? Sadly, and it must be said, not my surprise, she said no, that she’d already ironed it. My dislike of a badly ironed shirt was far greater than my dislike of her, so I insisted that I ironed the shirt, suggesting to her that one doesn’t get a second chance to make a first impression. I write this not as a boast, rather as a lament.

Because thanks to the nature of my brain injury – my lack of fine motor skills and balance problems – it means I can’t do my own ironing anymore. And because of my brain injury, I’ve lost all but two of my friends, which means I rarely have an occasion to go to where I need to look smart. “What’s that you say? Looking smart to maintain your own personal values? To retain your sense of self? Cop on to yourself and get some shape, even if your shirts don’t!
And you can forget any ideas you might’ve had about hand- washing shirts. You are aware that care workers are paid by the hour, aren’t you? A washing machine will do the job just fine. Yes it’s regrettable if shirts shrink because the care workers just bundled all the clothes in without first checking the washing instructions. Yes, you’ve told us that the clothes they shrunk predated the brain injury and therefore you attached an importance to them far beyond their material value, but they’ve said sorry and what else can they do?

The situation gets distinctly Quentin Crisp when it comes to domestic matters. Quentin Crisp said, just to remind you, as regards cleaning that after the first inch you don’t notice the dust. Again whilst my support workers were meant to help facilitate my day-to-day activities, the theory doesn’t translate into practical application. You might’ve been hitherto unaware that you were house-proud, even going so far as to use your food cupboard as a storage area for your shoes. So much so, that a plumber the instant he entered the bedroom in your old house was given to exclaim, “This room smells of trainers and laziness!” However it was only when you were rendered physically incapable of housework that you realized how house-proud you are. (When I write physically incapable, I mean of course doing it to a standard the me before the accident would have done it. Having written that I’m well aware that someone who used their food cupboard as a shoe rack is not best placed to pontificate about standards. Therefore, I’ll amend that doing it to a standard I’d like to imagine myself having done it, without the tiresome necessity of actually ever having done so.)

Perhaps it’s because I spend so much time in the house, and so consequently have more time to notice the dust and the cobwebs that it irks me so. I’m aware of the dichotomy inherent in the fact that precisely because I’ve so little going on in my existence, my brain compensates accordingly by dwelling on things that achieve an importance out of all relation to their actual importance.

But be that as it may, my shirt has shrunk.

Why the Labour leadership contest reminds me of the Scottish Referendum…

I know. It does on the face of it seem farfetched. But suspend your disbelief for just enough time as it takes for you read this post. This post won’t be a long one because instead of typing this, I should be re-editing a radio play I’m submitting to the BBC’s Writers Room, the deadline for which has the all of the approaching imminence of old age. In two weeks in fact. Also, with time being of the essence and all that, there are no links that you can click on to verify my claims. This is because a) I can see from my stats that hardly anyone clicks on them and b) much more importantly, I can’t be rsed.

Anyway. One thing that the Scottish Referendum proved was that young people aren’t apathetic about politics; it’s just that they don’t see it as having any real relevance to their lives. The political class and the media were agog at this seemingly sudden transformation, proclaiming that in order to capitalize on this activism by the young that there couldn’t, there mustn’t be a return to the old way of doing things. Young voters engaged with the political process was a good thing – as long as the engagement didn’t lead to a marriage.

Fortunately the ‘yes’ campaign lost, and by that I mean it’s all well and good people being enthused in large numbers, but only if they have the good manners to be on the losing side. And then the politics that could never go back to how it was, went back to how it was. The promises that were made at the last minute resembled nothing more than a panic stricken husband, who seeing his wife’s suitcase packed at the door promises to change, to give up this, to start that, anything to stop her leaving. Knowing even as he makes them he has no intention of carrying them out.

Another similarity between the Labour leadership vote and the Scottish referendum was the overwhelmingly negative campaign orchestrated by those who wanted to maintain the status quo. The ‘better together’ campaign might as well have had the funeral march as their campaign theme song; so unrelenting were the dire warnings of the terrible consequences of a ‘yes’ vote. Or at any rate, that’s what the media in England were feeding us.

The Labour leadership campaign has been run in a way that firmly embeds in the electorates mind that not only that here is a party at loggerheads with it’s founding principles, but more worryingly that three of the four candidates will say anything to cravenly appeal to them. That’s if the electorate can work out what they’re saying in the first place, as this clip demonstrates giving a simple answer to a simple question is somehow beyond three of them.

The Labour leadership has also demonstrated a quite breathtaking contempt for people – mainly young, who’ve never felt enthused by politics before – in claiming that people are only joining the Labour party to undermine it. If anyone is guilty of undermining the Labour party it’s the existing Labour leadership, Labour MP’s and grandees who are helpfully given media exposure to spread fear and uncertainty.

Tony Blair advising people not to vote for Jeremy Corbyn is a de facto endorsement to many who feel that under Blair, Labour saw winning as more important than doing and therefore moved so far the right they became wrong. Mandelson? Campbell? Their egotism in thinking they have any credibility with anyone is matched only by the platform they given in the media. If one were cynical one might think that an almost exclusively right wing press has a vested interest in running these stories with such prominence.

If you haven’t already guessed, I joined the Labour party as a supporter specifically to vote for Jeremy Corbyn. And I immediately got bombarded with emails from all of the other candidates asking me if I’d voted for them. Keen to do the very thing that the leadership and media verbwhores have been banging on about, I told them all I’d voted for them. In a way, this typifies why I’ve never joined a political party before, mainly because of what politicians say when they want your vote is watered down when they win. At least with Corbyn, any watering down he will make, will still make him more of a socialist than the other three.

And in what universe is Corbyn a radical? He’s only radical when compared to his rival candidates, who, lest we forget, all voted for the governments’ welfare cuts. This in itself proves how unfit they are to lead a party which champions – in theory – social justice, not just because they voted for it in the first place, which is unforgiveable. But also for the contempt inherent in such an act, contempt for the people whose vote they would later rely on. They knew a leadership contest was in the offing and still they did it?

One more thing before I get back to what I should be doing. Is it possible that young and old people have joined the Labour party because they finally hear someone articulating thoughts they knew they had and thoughts they never knew they had? And furthermore, is it possible that if Corbyn wins the Labour leadership and after five more years of toiling under the Conservative yoke, that the electorate might see things in a different light, and replace the farmer?

So much for this being a short post…..

Here’s the link to my post with all the music pasted in…..

I’m busy polishing a turd to a lustrous finish, so here are yet more of my musical favourites…